presentation

Climate impacts in aviation Cost-Benefit analyses: the uncertainties

Background

The impacts of aviation policy on society are often estimated with a Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA). On May 23, 2025, Airneth organized a seminar commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management on the uncertainties in aviation SCBAs and how to deal with them. Beelining discussed the uncertainties surrounding climate impacts.

Results

The climate impacts of aviation policy cannot be determined exactly. There are three types of uncertainties that arise at different points in the impact assessment:

  • Future uncertainty: SCBAs typically consider a period of 50 to 100 years. However, future demand for aviation, available airport capacity, technological developments and global warming cannot be accurately predicted. Future uncertainties are usually overcome in SCBAs by calculating effects for different future scenarios;
  • Policy uncertainty: National and international policies regarding aviation and the climate are also uncertain. A more ambitious international climate policy for instance means that additional national policies have less effect (and vice versa). Policy uncertainties can be captured with sensitivity analyses;
  • Knowledge uncertainties: Finally, there are multiple knowledge uncertainties, simply because certain effects cannot (yet) be precisely estimated based on existing models and knowledge. Knowledge uncertainties can also be overcome through sensitivity analyses.

The greatest (knowledge) uncertainty concerns the warming effect of non-CO2 components, particularly those of contrails and nitrogen (NOx). This is because: (1) the warming effect of non-CO2 components is still mainly based on a limited number of models and expert judgment, (2) certain processes in the atmosphere are not yet well understood, and (3) the warming effect of different components depends on multiple factors, including lifetime, location, time and altitude.

Because of these uncertainties, the warming effect of non-CO2 is tentatively derived from the effect of CO2 in Dutch SCBAs using a multiplier. The contribution of non-CO2 to the total climate impact of aviation is likely to decrease over time. Regulation and technological developments are causing non-CO2 components to become less prevalent. This will have a direct effect on limiting warming because of the limited lifetime of non-CO2. This is in contrast to CO2, which continues to contribute to warming even hundreds to thousands of years after emission. If the contribution of non-CO2 to the climate effect decreases, then the multiplier for non-CO2 in SCBAs will also have to decrease over time.

Methodology

The analysis is based on own expertise and a study of the relevant (scientific) literature. The author has extensive experience in the preparation of aviation SCBAs and was lead author of the official guidelines for Dutch aviation-specific SCBAs.

Colophon

Client: Airneth / Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management

Author: Rogier Lieshout

Type: Presentation

Date: May 2025

Files

(presentation is in Dutch)

questions about this publication?

Contact

If you have any questions about this publication or our services, please feel free to contact us by e-mail or via the contact form.

Contact details

info@beelining.nl

+31 (0)6 2823 7401

www.beelining.nl

KvK: 83803157

BTW: NL003875598 B18

Contact Form

other recent

Publications

Analysis of remaining uncertainties regarding the climate impacts in aviation Cost-Benefit Analyses.

Impact assessment of different variants of a night curfew at Schiphol.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of noise-mitigating measures in the context of the Balanced Approach procedure.