report
Slot mobility at Schiphol. A role for slot trading?
Results
Slot mobility occurs on a limited scale at Schiphol. Annually, 2 to 3 per cent of all allocated slots are exchanged between airlines. Slots are mainly exchanged between airlines belonging to the same airline group. In addition, slots are exchanged for joint operations. Mergers and acquisitions only sporadically lead to slot exchanges. The impact of slot mobility on competition is currently limited, as slots are mainly exchanged between airlines within the same airline group or alliance.
Facilitating slot trading could increase slot mobility and thus have a positive impact on market access, competition and efficient allocation of scarce airport capacity. Ensuring sufficient slot mobility becomes more important as scarcity at Schiphol increases. Slot trading is most effective when trading takes place in a public marketplace and slots are sold on a permanent basis:
- Public marketplace versus bilateral trading: A public marketplace increases transparency and enhances the effectiveness of slot trading. In a bilateral system, slots are less likely to be traded to direct competitors (including new entrants). Sellers prefer a bilateral system because they benefit from reduced price transparency and because it allows them to control which competitors obtain their slots. Buyers, however, benefit from as much transparency as possible and therefore prefer a public marketplace;
- Permanent sale versus temporary lease: Slot leasing allows airlines to temporarily transfer redundant slots to other airlines. Slot trading in the UK and the US mainly consists of leases, where slots are leased for a certain period of time to airlines that are not direct competitors. An important disadvantage of slot leasing is that the slots do not return to the slot pool. Airlines requiring slots therefore become dependent on competitors to lease slots. Due to the temporary nature of slot leases and the fact that leases generally do not occur between direct competitors, slot leasing has a limited impact on competition.
However, slot trading may also result in less market access, as fewer slots might return to the slot pool (to which new entrants have priority) and slots are potentially harder to finance for (smaller) new entrants.
Uncertainty about Schiphol’s future capacity makes it difficult for airlines to determine the value of a slot and may be a barrier to trading slots. Consequently, support for facilitating slot trading is currently limited among airlines.
Background
Capacity at Schiphol is limited. The available capacity is allocated by an independent slot coordinator through the issuance of slots. A slot gives an airline the right to land or take off at a certain time. When an airline uses at least 80 per cent of an allocated slot, it accrues grandfather rights over the relevant slots. This again entitles the airline to the relevant slots in the next equivalent season. At Schiphol, almost all slots have been allocated and 99 per cent of the slots are now subject to grandfather rights. As a result, hardly any slots flow back into the slot pool for reallocation by the slot coordinator. This may hinder competition and lead to a sub-optimal use of scarce airport capacity. Encouraging slot mobility (the exchange of slots between airlines) can improve this. When a slot exchange is accompanied by some form of monetary compensation, it is referred to as a slot trade. The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management has asked SEO Economic Research (SEO), To70, Beelining and the International Institute of Air and Space Law (IIASL) to assess the current level of slot mobility at Schiphol and the impacts of facilitating various forms of slot trading, taking into account the proposed reduction in airport capacity.
Methodology
The research consisted of a literature review on the impacts of slot mobility on competition and the economic value of slots. Current slot mobility at Schiphol was analysed based on data from the slot coordinator. This included a comparison with slot mobility at airports in the UK and the US. Support for slot mobility was investigated through interviews with relevant stakeholders. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of various forms of implementation of slot trading were analysed. Beelining was responsible for the analyses into current slot mobility at Schiphol and US airports and did a review on the final report.
Colophon
Client: Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management
In cooperation with: SEO Economic Research, To70, and the International Institute of Air and Space Law (IIASL)
Author(s): Christiaan Behrens, Martin Adler, Pieter Groskamp, Rogier Lieshout, Steven Truxal
Type: Research report
Date: November 2024
Files
(report is in Dutch)
questions about this publication?
Contact
If you have any questions about this publication or our services, please feel free to contact us by e-mail or via the contact form.
Contact details
info@beelining.nl
+31 (0)6 2823 7401
www.beelining.nl
KvK: 83803157
BTW: NL003875598 B18
Contact Form
other recent
Publications
Balanced Approach for Schiphol Airport
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of noise-mitigating measures in the context of the Balanced Approach procedure.
Responses due to tariff differentiation
Review of assumed airline responses due to a stronger differentiation of airport charges at Schiphol.
Slot mobility and trading at Schiphol
Assessment of slot mobility at Schiphol and the impacts of facilitating slot trading.