report
impact analysis of reduced flight activity at Schiphol
Results
Reducing the number of flights at Schiphol has a negative impact on the Dutch society. The negative impacts on consumers and businesses (in terms of higher ticket prices and longer travel times) outweigh the positive impacts on the climate and the environment (through reduced noise pollution, improved air quality and a higher level of safety). Reducing flight supply may have a negative impact on the business climate and the agglomeration of companies in the region. Impact on net employment are limited, although there may be temporary frictional unemployment. As noise pollution decreases, new opportunities for land use around the airport, such as residential development, arise. The results appear robust to various assumptions.
Background
Schiphol requires a nature permit to operate the airport. The Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature (LNV) only issues such a permit if Schiphol demonstrates that the impact of air traffic on the surrounding Natura 2000 areas remain within legal limits. If the limits are in danger of being exceeded, Schiphol must take measures to still meet the limits. This may require a reduction in the number of flight movements. The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (IenW) asked a consortium consisting of PwC/Strategy&, Adecs and MovingDot to assess the societal impacts of a possible reduction. Beelining advised the consortium on how passengers and airlines might respond to such a reduction, the impacts on the network and the quantification of the various impacts.
Methodology
The societal impacts were determined by contrasting a reference scenario with 500,000 flights per year with two alternative scenarios with fewer flights. The two alternative scenarios are possible scenarios on the basis of which the Ministry of LNV assesses the permit application:
- 460,000 flights on five runways
- 376,000 flights on four runways. Here the Polder-runway is no longer used and the number of flights is scaled back in such a way that noise pollution does not increase.
The impacts on consumers, businesses, the climate and the environment were quantified as much as possible. The analysis was not a full Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA), as the impacts were only estimated for one year (2018). In determining the impacts, however, the recommendations from the Aviation Specific SCBA Work Guide were followed as much as possible.
Colophon
Client: Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management
In cooperation with: PWC / Strategy&, Adecs, MovingDot
Type: Research report
Date: June 2022
Files
(report is in Dutch)
more information?
Contact
Curious about what Beelining can do for you? We look forward to hearing from you.
Contact details
info@beelining.nl
+31 (0)6 2823 7401
www.beelining.nl
KvK: 83803157
BTW: NL003875598 B18
Contact form
recent
Publications
Impacts of European airports
Study on the economic and wider social impacts of European airports and the connectivity they facilitate.
Net spending impacts of air travelers
Development of a methodology with associated spending figures to more accurately estimate the spending impacts of air travelers.
Relevance of leisure passengers
Study on the contribution of leisure passengers to Dutch welfare and the Schiphol network.
Impacts analysis of less flights at Schiphol
Study on the societal impacts of reduced flight activity at Schiphol in the context of a new nature permit.
Flight ban could raise ticket prices by 150 euros
Blog post on how the Russian flight ban may affect European airlines and passengers.
ESB article on aviation’s recovery
This ESB article describes how the aviation industry has recovered from the pandemic since early 2020 and looks ahead to the future.